This approach does not suggest that any and all talk of questions of cost (say) must be dispensed with. Rather, we must be careful not to allow these considerations to dominate our discussions of the advantages and disadvantages of different policies – as though investment opportunities or the loss to national GDP were the overriding concerns. Unfortunately this practice has become fairly common, as many groups have attempted to align their priorities with those of the mainstream media, of political and economic elites.
Popular Posts
-
Recent Posts
-
The Conscience Industry:
Tom Crompton at TEDxExeter -
The Mouse Paradigm:
how markets affect our morals - Values in education
- Embedded emissions and the secret life of consumer values
- It’s (not just) the environment, stupid!
- Cultivating Community Action in Scotland: a Values Approach
- Leave Our Kids Alone
- Rebuilding Optimism of Will
-
The Conscience Industry:
Twitter: valuesandframes
- Thanks @Marc_Bush We're doing some work on equality & human rights at the moment, would love to do some on poverty. @jrf_uk about 5 hours ago in reply to Marc_Bush ReplyRetweetFavorite
- Great XKCD cartoon about the power of language. Be sure to hover your cursor over it to read the "Alt text"... http://t.co/2XvIUGgRF1 about 9 hours ago ReplyRetweetFavorite
- Moving away from the 'rational man': we need to put more imagination and emotion into our sustainable visions! http://t.co/WDALosmGYf about 2 days ago ReplyRetweetFavorite
- RT @AnaBiurrun: Telling people to save the #environment for selfish reasons can backfire http://t.co/87s6k9ubjY @valuesandframes @Greenpea… about 5 days ago ReplyRetweetFavorite
- @rosaellis Don't: make it transactional / focus on 'small and easy' gains / do files in the eyes or 'grateful receiver'... about 5 days ago in reply to RosaEllis ReplyRetweetFavorite
